Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRobert O. Nyambati1*, Duncan G. Odhiambo2, Cornelius C. Serrem3and Caleb O. Othieno
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-26T09:42:57Z
dc.date.available2022-01-26T09:42:57Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn2457-0591
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.maseno.ac.ke/handle/123456789/4657
dc.descriptionDOI: 10.9734/jeai/2020/v42i930604en_US
dc.description.abstractDue to escalating cost of imported fertilizers, there is renewed interest in the use of local nutrient resources in managing soil fertility in Kenya. The effect of integrated use of urea and Calliandra or maize stover on maize yields,financial benefits was assessed in a field experiment carried at Nyabeda in western Kenya. Urea and Calliandra or maize stover were combined in a way to supply N at 75 kg ha-1from both sources in 100:0, 80:20, 60:40, 40:60, 20:80, 0:100, 0:0 ratios arranged in randomized complete block design (RCBD) with 12 treatments replicated four times in five consecutive seasons. Gross margins and benefit cost ratios were used for the analysis.Overall, maize stover (30 kg N ha-1) combined with urea (45 kg N ha-1) andCalliandra ( 45 kg N ha-1) combined with urea (30 kg N ha-1) gave the highest mean total biomass yields of 8.3 and 7.9 t ha-1 respectively. The two treatments out yielded the control by 89 and 80%respectively. The control and sole maize stover (75 kg N ha-1) had the lowest yields across all the seasons. Original Research Article The highest net benefits (71 USD) were recorded under maize stover (45 kg N ha-1) combined with urea (30 kg N ha-1) followed by Calliandra (30 kg N ha-1) combined with urea (45 kg N ha-1) at (68 USD). Sole application of maize stover gave the lowest benefit (-553 USD). Calliandra (30 kg N ha-1) combined with urea (45 kg N ha-1) was the only treatment that had a benefit: cost ratio approaching 2, and therefore, the most likelyof the tested technologies to be adopted by farmers. These results suggest that the use of both Calliandra and maize stover with modest amount of inorganic fertilizers (urea) is more profitable than sole use of either of the two N sources.en_US
dc.publisherJournal of Experimental Agriculture Internationalen_US
dc.subjectEconomic analysis; cost benefit ratio; integrated soil fertility management; Strigaen_US
dc.titleEconomic Evaluation of Organic and Inorganic Sources of Nitrogen under Striga Infestation in Western Kenyaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record