Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOTIENO, Pildas Odidi
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-21T13:12:30Z
dc.date.available2023-12-21T13:12:30Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.maseno.ac.ke/handle/123456789/5923
dc.description.abstractCommunity-oriented policing (COP) is no longer a ―quiet revolution‖ as Meese averred exactly 3 decades ago. Today, nearly every country has embedded COP principles into their policies and national police-related laws. In Kenya, this is reflected in the National Police Service Act (NPSA) 2011 and recently in a targeted regulatory piece – the Kenya COP Guideline/Booklet. One key goal is to bridge the divide between police and the community and create a partnership environment necessary for their engagement and proactive collaboration in policing. However, despite these policy and legal frameworks, crime and public disorder remain a significant challenge in Kisumu and the county is ranks way above national averages across many indicators of crime. Kisumu central bares a higher percentage of crime rate as compared to all other sub-counties as it hosts the city CBD, Kondele, Nyalenda, Obunga, and Manyatta slums all of which are categorized by the NCIC as hotspots for criminal activities. Consequently, this study investigated the assessment of police- community partnership in COP initiatives to combat crime in Kisumu Central sub-county, Kenya. Specific objectives examined the nature of community engagement in community policing policy and practice; assessed the extent of application of police-community collaborative problem-solving initiatives using a SARA model; and finally assessed the opportunities and challenges that underpin the implementation of COP in Kisumu Central sub-county. The study was guided by Systems Theory (von-Bertalanffy, 1972). An exploratory mixed-methods design was adopted, drawing respondents from each of the six administrative Wards. A sample size of 394 was drawn from the current population of Kisumu Central Sub-county based on the Fisher et al. (1991) formula. 18 Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) were with community members (6), police officers (6), and Community Policing Committee members (CPCM) (6). 16 Key Informant Interviews were held 2 with each of the 6 strata and an additional 4 with key community members, traditional leaders, youth representatives, and women representatives. Purposive and snowball sampling was used to recruit knowledgeable actors in FGDs and KIIs while simple random sampling was employed to administer household surveys. Simple descriptive statistics helped analyze survey data while qualitative data was analyzed thematically. The study revealed low levels of engagement across the five indicators used, low levels of collaboration in each other SARA model elements, and lastly that numerous challenges are responsible for this state of affairs. Together, findings revealed community perception that links lack of engagement and collaboration to be responsible for the perceived high rates of crime and disorder across the Sub-County. Fortunately, analysis shows that there are opportunities to turn the story around and make Kisumu Central Sub-County a better place to live. The study reveals the need for forging whole-of-government and whole-of-society mechanisms as well as a commitment by the Government of Kenya to walk her talks envisaged in the National Police Service Police Act 2011 by allocating resources to implement, monitor, and improve COP not only in Kisumu but across the countryen_US
dc.publisherMaseno Universityen_US
dc.titleAssessment of police-community partnership in community policing initiatives in combating crime in Kisumu Central sub- County, Kenyaen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record